Comments on: The Dialectic of Sex http://www.darcomic.org/2005/02/08/the-dialectic-of-sex/ A Journal Comic Tue, 27 Dec 2011 00:51:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: The French Waffle http://www.darcomic.org/2005/02/08/the-dialectic-of-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-9077 The French Waffle Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:08:04 +0000 http://www.darcomic.org/2005/02/08/the-dialectic-of-sex/#comment-9077 Thank you! Thank you!

]]> By: Rachel http://www.darcomic.org/2005/02/08/the-dialectic-of-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-9067 Rachel Sun, 17 Oct 2010 15:51:59 +0000 http://www.darcomic.org/2005/02/08/the-dialectic-of-sex/#comment-9067 People...questions like this posed in comics are *rhetorical*. People…questions like this posed in comics are *rhetorical*.

]]> By: Some new reader http://www.darcomic.org/2005/02/08/the-dialectic-of-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-8912 Some new reader Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:31:17 +0000 http://www.darcomic.org/2005/02/08/the-dialectic-of-sex/#comment-8912 All dialectical philosophy is gibberish. All dialectical philosophy is gibberish.

]]> By: dissembly http://www.darcomic.org/2005/02/08/the-dialectic-of-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-6998 dissembly Fri, 14 May 2010 04:04:51 +0000 http://www.darcomic.org/2005/02/08/the-dialectic-of-sex/#comment-6998 Noooo lexo, it means that Marxists think your lived circumstances, which includes-but-is-not-limited-to money, are a better place to begin to understand things than pure theory based on pre-conceived categories that sound cool. It means, "look at what happens around you first!" This *could* lead you to "sex drives everything" just as much as "money drives everything" - the point is you don't know until you take peoples lived experiences into account. It's about epistemology, and avoiding reification. Xu-kitty i love your short-short version, but i found your explanation more confusing than the original thing :P (also, re: epistemology and reification. I'm sorry. THEY IS NICE WORDS TO SAY.) Noooo lexo, it means that Marxists think your lived circumstances, which includes-but-is-not-limited-to money, are a better place to begin to understand things than pure theory based on pre-conceived categories that sound cool. It means, “look at what happens around you first!”

This *could* lead you to “sex drives everything” just as much as “money drives everything” – the point is you don’t know until you take peoples lived experiences into account.

It’s about epistemology, and avoiding reification.

Xu-kitty i love your short-short version, but i found your explanation more confusing than the original thing :P

(also, re: epistemology and reification. I’m sorry. THEY IS NICE WORDS TO SAY.)

]]> By: Matt http://www.darcomic.org/2005/02/08/the-dialectic-of-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-6413 Matt Sun, 04 Apr 2010 11:16:00 +0000 http://www.darcomic.org/2005/02/08/the-dialectic-of-sex/#comment-6413 I like how rhetorical questions in mediums with commentary forums always get answered. Though I must admit that if no one had done it I'd have :p I like how rhetorical questions in mediums with commentary forums always get answered. Though I must admit that if no one had done it I’d have :p

]]> By: lexo http://www.darcomic.org/2005/02/08/the-dialectic-of-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-4952 lexo Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:04:59 +0000 http://www.darcomic.org/2005/02/08/the-dialectic-of-sex/#comment-4952 It means that Marxists think that money drives everything and disagree with those who think that sex drives everything. It means that Marxists think that money drives everything and disagree with those who think that sex drives everything.

]]> By: Jen http://www.darcomic.org/2005/02/08/the-dialectic-of-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-2479 Jen Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:38:24 +0000 http://www.darcomic.org/2005/02/08/the-dialectic-of-sex/#comment-2479 It means that some genius out there figured out they could make big $$$ with a thesaurus and the wonder of tertiary education's captive audiences. It means that some genius out there figured out they could make big $$$ with a thesaurus and the wonder of tertiary education’s captive audiences.

]]> By: Xu-kitty http://www.darcomic.org/2005/02/08/the-dialectic-of-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-1906 Xu-kitty Sat, 15 Aug 2009 06:14:25 +0000 http://www.darcomic.org/2005/02/08/the-dialectic-of-sex/#comment-1906 It means the Author that wrote that may be a self-absorbed, pretentious <i>ass</I>, to resort to logorrhoea. XP Ugh, uhmm... lesse, cut, cut, cut, chop, cut... People are dismissing that theory (that I never heard of), because it makes Marxist, even though there is no proof for or against. Except that the Author isn't applying it to Econ. But, (according to the Author) it applies to gender relations, ie; the Author views women as the Poleteriat. Short short version: Author is saying: "Men are capitalist pig-dogs, my vagaina'd comrades." It means the Author that wrote that may be a self-absorbed, pretentious ass, to resort to logorrhoea. XP

Ugh, uhmm… lesse, cut, cut, cut, chop, cut…
People are dismissing that theory (that I never heard of), because it makes Marxist, even though there is no proof for or against. Except that the Author isn’t applying it to Econ. But, (according to the Author) it applies to gender relations, ie; the Author views women as the Poleteriat.

Short short version:
Author is saying: “Men are capitalist pig-dogs, my vagaina’d comrades.”

]]> By: snugglepuss http://www.darcomic.org/2005/02/08/the-dialectic-of-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-1588 snugglepuss Sat, 01 Aug 2009 05:51:34 +0000 http://www.darcomic.org/2005/02/08/the-dialectic-of-sex/#comment-1588 i got lost before the first letter 8s i got lost before the first letter 8s

]]> By: Salvar http://www.darcomic.org/2005/02/08/the-dialectic-of-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-865 Salvar Wed, 24 Jun 2009 08:09:36 +0000 http://www.darcomic.org/2005/02/08/the-dialectic-of-sex/#comment-865 http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/ http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/

]]>